Post-Publication Discussion and Corrections

1. Introduction

IJASCE recognizes that scholarly communication continues beyond publication. This policy outlines the mechanisms for facilitating post-publication dialogue, correcting the academic record, and ensuring ongoing accountability and transparency. It aligns with COPE Core Practices and international best practices for scholarly publishing.

2. Scope

This policy applies to all articles published by IJASCE. It governs:

  • Reader and author engagement after publication

  • Corrections of factual errors

  • Editorial updates

  • Retractions and expressions of concern

3. Policy Statement and Guidelines

IJASCE supports post-publication discussion and correction as part of its commitment to research integrity. Authors, readers, and third parties are encouraged to raise concerns, propose corrections, or respond to published work respectfully and with evidence.

3.1 Post-Publication Discussions

IJASCE allows scholarly discussions through:

  • Letters to the editor

  • Correspondence articles

  • Author responses and replies

  • Comments submitted via the journal’s contact system

All submissions must be evidence-based, relevant, and respectful in tone. Editorial decisions on publishing discussions are final and based on merit.

3.2 Corrections

Minor errors (e.g., typographical, formatting, metadata) that do not affect the article's scientific conclusions may be corrected through an erratum or corrigendum, depending on whether the error originated with the journal or the author.

All corrections:

  • Will be linked to the original article

  • Will be labeled clearly with a correction notice

  • Will include the reason for correction and date

3.3 Expressions of Concern

If a serious concern is raised but further investigation is pending or inconclusive, IJASCE may publish an Expression of Concern to inform readers of the potential issue.

This notice will remain associated with the article until the concern is resolved or dismissed.

3.4 Retractions

Retractions are issued when:

  • Major errors invalidate the results

  • Misconduct (e.g., plagiarism, data fabrication) is confirmed

  • Ethical breaches are discovered

Retraction notices will:

  • Be clearly labeled and linked to the original article

  • Remain publicly accessible

  • Explain the reason and basis for retraction

The retracted article will remain online with a watermark or label to maintain the scholarly record.

3.5 Article Versioning

In cases where articles are updated (e.g., to add data or clarify methods), a version history will be maintained, and major changes will be documented.

4. Responsibilities

Authors are responsible for reporting errors and responding to concerns.
Readers are encouraged to report valid concerns respectfully.
Editors investigate issues fairly and determine the appropriate action using COPE flowcharts.

5. Process for Handling Breaches

All concerns will be acknowledged within five business days. Investigations are confidential and may involve contacting authors, institutions, or third-party experts. Final decisions will be guided by COPE retraction and correction guidelines.

6. Related Policies and References

  • COPE Retraction Guidelines

  • COPE Flowcharts for Corrections and Retractions

  • IJASCE’s Allegations of Misconduct Policy

  • IJASCE’s Ethical Oversight Policy

7. Review and Updates

This policy was last reviewed in August 2025. It is reviewed annually or in response to emerging publishing norms or recurring issues.